links in body.

I saw a post yesterday about chemtrails and everybody poopooed the thought of secret civilian chemical testing by the US government.

Unfortunately, the Church committee, the 1975 senate committee that outed the US intelligence agencies and US military for their human rights abuses against US civilians and military personnel, received direct testimony from those agencies conducting the experiments that various branches of the US government, without notification or consent, absolutely and admittedly conducted live civilian experiments with harmful chemical and biological agents and weapons via sea, land and air, beginning at the very latest in the early 1940s and continuing for at least 30 testing years, supposedly ending in the late 1970s after the experiments were exposed by the 1975 Senate committee chaired by Frank Church.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Committee

while chemical and biological agents were dropped by air hundreds of times(chemtrails) onto unaware US civilian populations, chemical and biological weapons and toxins were also sprayed over dozens of US cities without notification or consent via Operation sea spray and related operations:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

these abuses are settled US history.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
    0·
    17 days ago

    you keep ranting and playing pretend, I’ll repeat the same facts I first posted, just as true 30 comments later.

    good deal.

    The US government admitted to using biological weapons on non-consenting US citizens to test the efficacy of those weapons, and no amount of your bitterness at having to learn something new can change that evidence.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      17 days ago

      Playing pretend in what way? I told you, as soon as you support your specific statements that you’ve made, or admit you were wrong, we’re cool. I don’t see what is being pretended.

      Specifically, you saying “using weapons” in this case. The bacteria were not weapons. They were studying weapons, by using other bacteria that behave similar to weapons. I don’t think you actually care, but I do I’m afraid. Where in the report does it say weapons were released? Not studied, released?

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
        0·
        16 days ago

        All my sources have supported the same facts from the top to bottom.

        your incorrect theories don’t matter here, The facts are known and provided by the US government. testified, documented fact.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          16 days ago

          No, it does not support everything you’ve been saying. This is why you’ve had to do ninja edits to change what you were saying. Remember that part?

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            0·
            16 days ago

            the sources support everything I’ve been saying from the top.

            remember how you pretended the documented, verified US government sources weren’t real and then admitted that the sources were real after 3.5 hours yesterday?

            I can wait another few hours for you to remember.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
              0·
              16 days ago

              No, I do not remember denying any sources were real. Where in any of my (still unedited btw) comments did that happen? Or are you just making shit up again?

                • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  0·
                  16 days ago

                  You really do like making claims you can’t back up. If I was wrong and you could prove it, it’d be a win for you. Unless you actually just can’t, though.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    0·
                    16 days ago

                    My entire post is backed up with verified sources.

                    with established historical fact.

                    can’t say the same for your imaginings.