Not all marine life, just the big stuff. We just added a ton of sugar, fat and protein to the ocean, so I think we’re going to see an explosion of microbial life.

Now, with milk being opaque, I think we are going to kill most of the phytoplankton and replace it with bacteria that produce CO2 as a byproduct of their metabolism, so I do think we’re going to drastically change the Earth’s atmosphere and more or less run out of oxygen eventually, so we are definitely all dead. It’s just a question of how long it takes.

Even when I see Elrond in LotR, that’s actually just Agent Smith in a funny costume.

Wouldn’t we also be under enough pressure to begin fusing some of that hydrogen into helium at that point?

If that’s really true, you could easily have copy/pasted your evidence. The only reason you wouldn’t is if you can’t. Which is why you just keep saying the same things like that will somehow change something.

Really? Then prove this:

remember how you pretended the documented, verified US government sources weren’t real

Unless you just made it up out of the blue, of course. You do that a lot. You just keep chanting how right you are, but never copy anything to actually prove it. Very weak, when anyone can chant anything.

You really do like making claims you can’t back up. If I was wrong and you could prove it, it’d be a win for you. Unless you actually just can’t, though.

No, I do not remember denying any sources were real. Where in any of my (still unedited btw) comments did that happen? Or are you just making shit up again?

No, it does not support everything you’ve been saying. This is why you’ve had to do ninja edits to change what you were saying. Remember that part?

Playing pretend in what way? I told you, as soon as you support your specific statements that you’ve made, or admit you were wrong, we’re cool. I don’t see what is being pretended.

Specifically, you saying “using weapons” in this case. The bacteria were not weapons. They were studying weapons, by using other bacteria that behave similar to weapons. I don’t think you actually care, but I do I’m afraid. Where in the report does it say weapons were released? Not studied, released?

I’m not fighting against the facts. I’m fighting against you. You thinking everything you say is a fact without having to prove it is a you problem. Doesn’t mean I have to go along with it. Nitpicking is about facts, you know. True/false.

I have no issues with you sticking to the facts. If you just did that, we’d have no issues, remember? It’s when you add things, remember your ninja edit to delete “radiological”? Don’t blame me for calling you out on this stuff. Or, y’know, just let me know why you like to twist things.

edit: btw, “sour lemons?” Are you actually an older person? I haven’t heard that one in ages.

Ahh, the “I know you are, but what am I?” defense. I see we’ve regressed back to grade school. And you call me juvenile? lol I guess Trump does that one too, so you could also be really elderly.

Or, y’know, you could just admit you like adding things to your sources beyond what they actually say.

In what way can context change the meaning of “releasing weapons” into something else?

I already told you several times, you take certain true things, mix them with lies, and then spin it together into your overall message. Then you do ninja edits when these are pointed out. Did you forget?

Kinda hard to call it misdirection when I’m directly quoting you from a different comment you made and asking you to either support it or admit you were twisting words around. Seems like a pretty straight direction to me, no? I mean, if you really read it, it’d be pretty easy to say where in it you got that from.

I’m not asking you to distort anything. I’m asking you to tell me where in your sources it supports you when you said this:

admitted to using chemtrails to disperse biological weapons

Because what I read is another, much less dangerous bacteria was spread to study how spreading happened. And we can tell, too, because tons of people didn’t die, and weapons are for killing people. Make sense? Or you can just admit that you’ve been subtly twisting the truth to suit your ends.

It doesn’t really matter if you care. Just stop making up things to add and stick to the true parts and everything will be fine. Can you do that maybe?

Scaring me? More like offending me. I don’t like lies in my YSK subs. Like I said, if you had stuck to only the true parts of your posts, we wouldn’t be having this problem. Not that I expect you to really remember what I said anymore I suppose.

You can try personal insults all you want, but it’s your words and your sources I’ve been using. Anyone that reads them will see that I am right and you are not.

No, you’re not. You’re repeating some facts, and slipping in lies. I’m not going to let you get away with it.

You said they released biological weapons. That is not true, they released other bacteria. Your sources said that. Can you admit it?

Oh, I will. Sure, you can keep just repeating yourself, but all I have to do is use your own words to point out your slipped-in falsehoods.

Where in your sources does it call the released bacteria the actual dangerous weapons themselves? Or were they using a different, less dangerous bacteria, like your sources actually said?