If you have a 1% error rate in tweets, even if you proofread that’s still a .01% chance to make a mistake. With the volume of tweets it shouldn’t surprise you that some people make mistakes even if they proofread.
Proofreading wouldnt really help this would it? Cp wasnt a typo, they intentionally typed it thinking … well iunno what they were thinking but likely along the lines of " good abbreviation for cyperpunk, really saved some time huh".
Depends on how you’re defining proof reading I suppose, but I agree, I don’t necessarily think it would. But maybe seeing it a second time might jog a memory. Who knows.
If you have a 1% error rate in tweets, even if you proofread that’s still a .01% chance to make a mistake. With the volume of tweets it shouldn’t surprise you that some people make mistakes even if they proofread.
Proofreading wouldnt really help this would it? Cp wasnt a typo, they intentionally typed it thinking … well iunno what they were thinking but likely along the lines of " good abbreviation for cyperpunk, really saved some time huh".
Depends on how you’re defining proof reading I suppose, but I agree, I don’t necessarily think it would. But maybe seeing it a second time might jog a memory. Who knows.