It goes without saying, DVDs/BlueRays.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We call it AI now but machine learning algorithms have been around for 70 years now and basically run the world

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No way. We will build grids and power for eventual AI takeover of common employees like fast food. It’s a sad future.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      AI technologie could be nice. LLM and Diffusion models ruining the Internet with fake information and Fake art, being over hyped as AI that will change the world, all while burning up unimaginable amounts of energy? Yeah, I also hope it goes away.

  • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t think we will be losing optical disks ever.

    If burned properly they hold storage for a very long time without data loss. IIRC Facebook burns optical disks for old photographs and instead of having a hard drive array or tape library they had a RAID based optical disk system.

    Optical disks are great, but not for the daily user since most media content is online and most storage is judged on being rewritable.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Bike locks. Surveillance will be expanded to the point that petty crimes will become impossible.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What technology will disappear in the next 10 years?

        It will be fully automated. You mark the position and time, an AI checks the record and the thief will be punished. No police nor judge needed.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          Doesn’t really keep my bike where I expect it to be, though, does it? So what does all that violation of human rights actually buy us?

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Tablets.

    The market for them is very thin. With phones getting bigger and convertible laptops being more lightweight I don’t see much market for tablets.

    Which is a shame because it’s s good format for comic reading and more durable than a convertible laptop (they always break by the hinges) but I think in ten years it will be quite hard to find a tablet for sale.

    • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Honestly I would say it might go the other way with laptops disappearing and being replaced with tablets.

      The operating systems and software on tablets is getting ever more capable even for productivity stuff. Add to that newer generations growing up while using mostly smartphones and maybe sometimes a computer and I believe if having to decide they would choose a tablet over a laptop. In general the line between laptops and tablets is getting a bit blurry with windows based tablet PC’s and tablets that come with a keyboard cover.

  • fjordo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d say charging cables / most kinds of wires.

    People are used to and comfortable with wireless charging these days despite it being spotty in terms of availability.

    Better charging rates and capacity to power larger appliances might end up with you having a completely wireless home.

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Only true wireless charging would kill wired chargers. The so called wireless charger still need to be charged with a cable

    • deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wireless charging is slow, inefficient, and straight up wastes power. It’s not that great.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’ve heard this before. But the biggest downside of wireless charging for me is I can’t use my device while it’s charging. Wireless chargers in the vast majority of scenarios aren’t even getting rid of wires. You still need to connect the wireless charger to the wall with a cable.

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Manual appliances. You can open the fridge, but only if you pay your monthly subscription fee to keep it restocked.

    We work hand-in-hand with retailers to make online shopping the default, whilst making the UI only accessible to AI bots, so if you want a stocked fridge; pay your fees.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yup. Worse still, I can see this extending to other appliances. Haven’t paid your monthly washing machine service fee? Our partnership with the only water company in your area authorizes us to shut off your water.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        then you made incredibly uninspiring use of the tools and nobody will miss your participation.

        • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Participation in what? A quick search on how to fix my toilet and how a toilet works. You think I was going to sign up for a toilet message board and chat?

        • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah I do realize the inevitable problem when their sources dry up because no one is communicating anymore but for the quick questions about how something works in the world it’s extremely convenient. I’d just be asking Google anyway.

          • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            But you can’t see the source of the information, which means it could be a reputable source, or it could be Joe-Sucks-His-Own-Dick from Reddit. In another comment, I pointed out that AI was telling people to put glue on pizza to keep the cheese from falling off—if you can see the source, you are much more likely to understand the veracity of the information.

          • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Not trusting Chat-GPT results, which are known to hallucinate false information, as your primary search method is a silly take? AI was telling people to put glue on pizza to keep the cheese from falling off. If you can see that the source of that information is a Reddit shitpost, you are way more likely to make a good judgment call about the veracity of that information.

            If you want searches without sponsored results, use SearXNG or an equivalent that strips out the ads.

            • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You can actually ask for its sources now and fact check yourself. But just like anything you read online, use common sense. I’d see those same results in a Google search too.

                • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  If it’s something serious, yes. Like fixing something. I also use it as an idea generator. I needed to figure out why my toilet wasn’t flushing. It suggested the flapper. So then I went to YouTube and looked up a video on how to install it once it pointed me in a direction.

  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d say consumer printers

    We’re running towards all digital, only a few edge cases will still require them

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      self-inflicted, if they played nice we would all be printing from home.

      upside is less paper waste

  • koper@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not disappear entirely, but most households won’t own desktop computers or HDDs.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Most people connected to the Internet today have never owned a desktop computer nor an HDD. A crazy amount of people have been introduced to computing with smartphones.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t expect it so quickly, but hopefully lithium ion batteries (and variants like Li-poly, LiFePO4, etc)

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sodium batteries are already commercially available and although their volumetric energy density and round trip efficiency is lower than lithium I think they are a promising alternative to lead acid and some lithium applications.

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Safer, very high power to weight ratio, better self discharge stability and good temperature range performance are the advantages. The most important one is of course the lack of massive environmental impact of water hungry lithium mining in dry environments and the geopolitical challenges evident in lithium sourcing.

          There are a few electric vehicles with this chemistry and I predict it will replace lithium based chemistries in lower cost, smaller vehicles.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can you explain why and how? Do you imagine other (better?) batteries, or the disappearance of the need for batteries?