• TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Milk is 87 percent water. If the water in milk is replaced, there would be water in that milk. Potentially creating an explosion of milk everywhere or a tremendous thickening of the milk.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Given that humans are mostly water, we would probably die…instantly? Within a few minutes?

    Definitely very very quickly.

    • edinbruh@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Obviously that’s not what “replace all water with milk” means. It means just replacing the water in water form. Like oceans, rivers, and aqueducts. If it meant also the water content of other stuff like the body it just wouldn’t be possible, because milk is mostly water and you would have to replace that as well

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The problem is you’re trying to apply logic to magic. Magic doesn’t do things logically, it just does them.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Now you have to define “water form”. What percentage of dissolved constituents prevent water from being “water form”? Or is it how it looks rather than what’s in it?

        It’s possible to have a brine solution of 25% salt that looks like ordinary water, at least at first glance, for example. Would only the H2O molecules in that be replaced by milk or would the salt be replaced as well?

        What if I add food dye to a glass of water beforehand? That doesn’t look like water any more, so would that get turned into milk? Would the dye stay?

        How about if I mixed an emulsifier, oil and chalk dust into a glass of water beforehand? That’s not milk, but it looks like milk. What would happen with that? And then we’re back to percentages again, I guess.

        • edinbruh@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My definition is that if it’s something that common sense would call water, it’s water. This is the simple trick that defeats all stupid questions.

          In your example, brine isn’t water because it’s brine, you even said that in the example.

          And if you add food dye to a glass of water, it’s water but colored. Even with you yourself wrote the example implying that it should be water.

          The oil with chalk emulsified in water has nothing to do with milk, what does it matter that it looks like milk. And as you yourself implied, it should not be considered water, but an emulsion of stuff.

          And notice how I avoided talking percentages, I simply questioned your own common sense. You didn’t even think about it, and yet your common sense made the solution clear in your examples.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is a genie. That’s exactly what it means when she says “replace all the water in the world with milk”. Genies hate people. They are malicious spirits that have been imprisoned by sorcerrers to serve them and their wishes. The only thing is that it probably isn’t going to work because they are not omnipotent and have limited power usually. Enough to “fulfill a wish” of a greedy dude and fuck them over in the process, but not enough to destroy the universe.

        • edinbruh@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But even a genie can’t replace the water in milk with milk because it doesn’t make sense, so that cannot be the genie’s interpretation of the wish

          • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Have you never done a “replace all” in a word document?

            All of the water inside milk is now milk. All the stuff that wasn’t water that had already been in milk is now mixed in with the new milk. You have double milk. Mmilklk.

            • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              But by replacing the water part of the milk with milk you’ve replaced some of that water with water which isn’t replacing it with milk, and if you keep going you’ve replaced all water with butter which is not milk.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean, having the shits is gonna be the least of our problems. All marine life will cease to exist, so diarrhea is only a problem for a little while.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not all marine life, just the big stuff. We just added a ton of sugar, fat and protein to the ocean, so I think we’re going to see an explosion of microbial life.

      Now, with milk being opaque, I think we are going to kill most of the phytoplankton and replace it with bacteria that produce CO2 as a byproduct of their metabolism, so I do think we’re going to drastically change the Earth’s atmosphere and more or less run out of oxygen eventually, so we are definitely all dead. It’s just a question of how long it takes.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      She wouldn’t have even had time to get to wish 2 and 3. “All water” includes the water in her body. Turning all of it into milk would probably kill you.