What are everyone’s thoughts on bots like piped bot and tdlr bot

  • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I appreciate them, but never use them. I already auto-redirect youtube links to an alt frontend, and already don’t read articles.

  • DABDA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Piped bot pisses me off because it doesn’t seem to check if the triggering comment already includes the exact link it’s about to post. I used to preemptively include Piped links with any YouTube ones but since it would trigger the bot anyway I just stopped bothering.

    Aside from the clutter it adds, until I added the bot itself to my blocklist (instead of just relying on “Show bots” being unchecked in settings) it would also cause reply notifications that couldn’t be cleared in the default Lemmy web UI.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Piped bot is annoying. I never bother using it’s links. I have ReVanced for that. I didn’t know if the jobs it makes are actually useful to anyone.

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      What I would love is a bot that takes yt links and posts the corresponding title and description of the video.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a mixed bag. Piped bot is just generally “meh” for me. With all the ad blocking I have turned on, I don’t really see ads on Youtube and would rather give what little support my views provide to the creators on the platform. I also subscribe to Nebula to try and support them directly.

    Many of the bots, especially the really noisy re-post type bots I tend to block. Sure, I want to see content on Lemmy, but a bot reposting everything from a site has a problem with just creating a lot of noise without any sort of filtering for interesting content. But, since I can block them selectively, I’d rather people had the room to create and I’ll just remove the ones I don’t like from my feed. Everyone wins.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    TLDR bot often takes items out of context and come off just plain wrong. Or it’s a long article skips important things entirely. To get the correct story just read the original.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I bloody love them both. Yeah, tldr isn’t perfect, but it’s usually “good enough”. And the piped bot makes life so much easier for anyone wanting to share something cool without having to jump through that extra hoop.

    True QOL bots, both of them

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I never bother clicking the piped bot links, and I’m not a fan of the tldr bot either as I think there’s activity on a post but it turns out it’s just the bot.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I find them a bit annoying, particularly TLDR bot, as it sometimes butchers articles by leaving out key information, so much so that it nearly borders on misinformation (eg, in an article about a SE Asian country voting on gay marriage, it cut out all portions about the vote, suggesting that it was legalized when it hadn’t been voted on yet or passed.)

    Unfortunately, it gets highly upvoted, so many people skip the article and think that this country now has legalized gay marriage when it actually has not.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also will never present things like date of publication or author. Both of which can change the context of the whole thing.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Piped is the only way to prevent youtube’s spying from fucking up my algorithm even though I went out of the way to open it in incognito

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have history and recs turned off in youtube, it’s great. The front page is blank with a search bar.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I still need it for finding stuff that isn’t oops all sports and celebrity bullshit. I’ve spent years telling it what i’m not into, even though it still suggests most of it.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like the TLDR bot but I wouldn’t rely on it for anything important. I’ll read the summary and if it’s just some fluff piece, I’m not too worried about it if it skipped a detail. But for serious journalism, I read the article. There’s a huge difference between an article about a video game or celebrity and an article about a war or natural disaster.

    Piped bot doesn’t seem to work for me anyway but I don’t usually click video links. I prefer text to video for actual info so I mostly just click the videos on a comment when it’s an obvious joke and they’re referencing something funny.

  • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    What are everyone’s thoughts on bots like piped bot and tdlr bot

    I don’t mind them. If I did I’d block them.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    PipedBot: no issues with it.

    TldrBot: I get frustrated with the number of times I see a story where only the bot has commented. “There’s someone here… No there’s not”.

    It’s not the bots fault really, but I wonder if it should wait until somebody else has commented so zero comment stories stay at zero.

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think most clients should implement some kind of logic to remove bot comments form the comment counts. AFAIK, lemmy already has a feature to distinguish bots(?), so it should probably should be possible to at least suggest some easy enough api for that if none exist currently.

  • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Conceptually useful bots (even if they aren’t always great) like those two I approve of. You can easily ignore them, but they’re there for when you want them.

    The meme bots that were on reddit like grond we could do without. They were fun at the time, but I’m glad we don’t have them here.