• hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Finding Hitler isn’t the hard part of time traveling. Ideally you would need to be not too far above Earth’s surface, moving with the same speed and in the right direction - to prevent suffocation or to just leave a greasy stain.

    If you get this right, from my point of view, you earned yourself the right to applaud yourself and maybe even Hitler (I’m won’t kink shame).

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s sad how many people don’t get that “time” includes the relative placement of objects in space and that going back 50 years might mean Earth is in a difference physical location than yourself.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t get these arguments. If we ate talking about hypothetical scenarios when we invent time machine to go back to a particular point in time, why not assume we can also choose a particular point in space, predict where earth would be or view the space before you jump in yourself. This is just a simple comic anyway, not deep enough to talk about viability of time travel.

        • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is just a simple comic anyway, not deep enough to talk about viability of time travel.

          It’s nice to think about things. Do you think thinking about things should be limited real things?

          If it was assumed that you can’t change the future but fork a new thread of reality instead, it would be as relevant.

          I agree with you, that it is OK if you don’t think there is a need for you to enter that train of thought, though.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The beginning of your comment sounded aggressive and that others are idiots for laughing about this comic without considering limitations of time travel. Probably want your intention but that’s how it looked to me and why I left the comment. Never claimed we can’t talk about imaginary things, just that we don’t necessarily have to.

            • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t know. I didn’t feel aggressive when I typed it. I was in a quite content mood, and I didn’t want to imply anything. Just needed to kill a few minutes while typing and was enjoying myself. So if it felt aggressive to you, I’m sorry.

              Yes, maybe then, I needed to point out that time travelling has its hardships, to which people turn a blind eye at times. And I’m sure an ironic tone was intended by me.

  • burgersc12@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you want to go back in time, killing Hitler is not the solution! Go back in time, and kill this fucker

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well going abck 80 odd years and finding hitler is much easier than going back an indeterminate amount of millions and finding this exact fish.

      But I completely agree.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you can time travel I’m sure you can track down the only fish walking on land at that time. After that you just gotta make sure the ocean critters stay where they belong!!

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          the only fish walking on land

          If that were how evolution works… maybe. Unfortunately it doesn’t, at all, so definitely not.

          • burgersc12@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The meme is usually that this single fish is responsible for every single human problem, I was just playing along with that. I don’t really think that it was only a single fish walking on land back then. Had to be exactly two, how else would they reproduce /s

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Ahh, we need an /s for deadpan. I’d use it often. I appreciate you taking the time to explain though! Sometimes, I need it 😅

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Targeting John Calvin and his early followers would be a good choice as well as Calvinism is responsible for Prosperity Gospel beliefs.