Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Vietnam. Decent enough government and standard of living, and they whooped America’s ass so bad that it’d be political suicide to go back there. I mean, what kind of timeline would we have to be on for someone to be stupid enough to… hmm.

    Considering that fucking Greenland is caught up in it now, idk that anywhere is safe.

  • Exactly where I am.

    I moved to a backwater town in the middle of the desert for a fucking reason, worse comes to worst and I’ve got the benefit of being able to travel in literally any direction and be on res.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    While Latin America is, overall, a good choice, it’s important to recognize that the mask off fascism we are seeing from the US will only increase the meddling they already do on their “backyard”, so keep that in mind.

    • The@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Was gonna say that.

      It was pretty safe in the last two world wars.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        If you weren’t living under one of the US sponsored dictatorships, sure.

          • lorty@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Costa Rica, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Venezuela, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil and probably more I’ve failed to remember.

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              That’s was after WWII, during WWII Latin America was a “safe” heaven

              • lorty@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                I suppose if your only concern is whether a bomb is going to drop on you, you are correct. But maybe you should consider if being kidnapped, tortured and killed without your family ever knowing what actually happened to you is “safe”

  • edel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    If we take its actual definition; far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist, countries like Cuba for sure fits the bill. Now Cuba is authoritarian (and normal since they are in permanent and genuine threat from its neighbor) and probably that is not what is in your mind. Latin America is, as many as you pointed out, no ideal… but most countries there at least lacks of a strong government to enforce things (for better or worse) so, in a turbulent world, it is indeed a better bet. I think, for the time being, Spain has proven to be resilient to authoritarianism and even the voters of “extreme” parties are not that extreme themselves! In Latin America, Mexico is proven to have an amazing leadership (today, I consider it the best worldwide) so unlikely to change overnight. Colombia, Chile and Uruguay seems promising too.

    • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      See, when we analyze Latin America countries, one cannot think exclusively in terms of US or Europe political science. Our states may seem like weak forces when scrutinized from afar, however this is exactly the problem. Fascism has different ways of spreading through institutions and evangelical militias or drug cartels are literally everywhere. Sometimes, our states do not enforce fascism by law. They are weak on surface and extremely dangerous in their militias and affiliations with drug cartels. The contradiction is the rule around here. Mexico is not the heaven you make it sound. Do not trust a country’s safety based on official governments, it is a starter error when analyzing Latin America politics

      • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        A concerning example regarding what I’m saying is the fact that over Rio de Janeiro there are drug cartels which distribute cocaine packed in Israel’s flag. I wish I was kidding.

        Is it because they’re Jewish? They support Palestine’s genocide? No, they’re Christian Neopentecostal Evangelicals who apply their (unofficial but VERY real) rules based on the Bible and make money over cocaine cartels. Israel’s flag is a way of showing they are God’s chosen and the true governors of Rio de Janeiro.

        This is only a superficial example.

        • edel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Thanks for the article! Yes, South America is not free from this. One thing I have learned in my life is that how similar people we are everywhere… only circumstances make us seem different. Long gone are my admiration for Scandinavians! What most South America seems however (specially if a sizeable country), is distant enough from China, US and Russia to be easily dragged along in a conflict… and also their governments are weak enough to implement a global draft for instance.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Marquesas islands. They are very large, no dangers, lot of hideouts, lot of food resources, innaccessible for wheel vehicles, almost impossible to build large bases and to urbanise (small interest for China), they are isolated from other archipelagos, and the islands have not even 10k inhabitants in total (14 islands) so no one would get interest in nuking here.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Bold to presume that we would want to survive it.

    Fwiw Musk says that he wants to leave Earth and go to Mars, which is great news for the rest of us:-).

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s not. The story about mars allowed Musk to build the rockets to launch the StarLink satellites.

      Given the preparation for war with China, can we exclude that those satellites carry payloads to take down intercontinental missiles?

      Otherwise the USA could feel safe and be willing to engage in a nuclear war.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Most of the violence and oppression gets exported, so it’s probably best to just sit tight here in the heart of the empire.

      • ImInLoveWithLife@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Hawai’i will be a main base of operations for strategic command and targeted as a result. The islands are crawling with the US military and then there is the naval installation at Pearl Harbor. If I had to go with an island in the chain though, I would choose Moloka’i. That is if the locals would have me. They are more self sustaining there.

        • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          I recommend against Hawaii. It’s not exactly self sustaining since there are too many people living there. Housing/rent is crazy high so there are many homeless. Everything is much more expensive. Jobs can be hard to find. The islands are sinking. Storms still hit every season. Depending on the island, you may be dealing with volcanic eruptions and vog. And I do believe their coral reefs are bleaching. It sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. Then factor in the locals, they only want locals living there and to restore their Hawaiian Kingdom, #GoHomeHaole. Best to pick somewhere else.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Latin America. They are not aligned with NATO or Russia/China. And the level of life quality have greatly improved in later years. In fact many migrants feel cheated when coming here because they thought europe was better than it actually is in comparison.

  • nomecks@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Argentina probably. Generally the southern hemisphere is pretty safe. Nobody’s wasting nukes on brown people, except maybe Israel.

    • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Wouldn’t bet on argentina. They’ve got their own dickhead in chief who’s also waging war against progress.

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah, it may not be the best choice, but not the worst either. They’re not much of a threat to the big powers, and if they just stay out of it they’ll probably come through fine.

        • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          You’ve got a lot more faith in the system than I do, I think. I don’t think people like Milei wouldn’t coup if a global conflict that strained trade routes were to happen. Authoritarians like him don’t need much prodding to take advantage of a bad situation.

          Big hypothetical, ik, but it wouldn’t surprise me if people like him leaned on fascist legacy.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Most Americans have no idea how historically similar the US and Argentina actually were. It’s honestly weird that Argentina’s similar circumstances didn’t turn it into a great power like the US.

  • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Everyone saying Latin America has absolutely no clue about what Latin America is, lol. The only place safe from fascism rn is either another planet or being dead.

    • TWB0109@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      As a Costa Rican, I agree. Hell, we even have one of trumps deportation (concentration) camps over here

        • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          No. Moving elsewhere is a high emotional and financial cost that I will avoid until it is not possible to avoid anymore (also, where in the world is safe of fascism rn?)