I am kind of too scared to ask here, but what did it actually achieve?

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    What does anything achieve on a long enough timeline? The same nothingness, but for 25 hours the entire senate could do nothing but bear witness to an unyielding resistance to the cruelties currently in motion. May not be much but some will find inspiration in those that continue to make ‘good trouble’ I personally found a spark of hope and I’m a real cynic tbh

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Allowed the media to focus on something other than Trump.

    He also beat Strom Thurmond’s speech. I’m fine with a black guy beating that piece of shit’s record.

            • TTH4P@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              I guess I’m just a little more cynical and you’re just a little more idealistic. If you review this thread, and the many other threads posted about this speech, in full you’ll see I’m not the only one who feels like this is bare minimum effort from Democrat leadership. Agree to disagree.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              they elected oz in the very next session; using a filibuster to prevent his confirmation is how you use a filibuster effectively.

                • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  the same way thurmond did it; you secure the votes behinds the scenes and then throw a filibuster when it’s time to vote to turn up the pain; not when there’s nothing on the table and no one around like booker did it.

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Politics isn’t sportsball, so no. Breaking arbitrary stats doesn’t mean shit in terms of making material changes in the world, which is what politics is about.

      • Botzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Let’s be fair now: he also raised his national profile among the party faithful.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Think of it like a protest. Most protests don’t DO anything, but he forced the entire senate to sit and listen to him for 25 hrs rant about how bad things have gotten. I’m sure there was work and stuff they were supposed to vote on that he effectively delayed. But that’s all it really was, a record breaking protest.

    • Mee@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      But it literally it was on the news for a day, that’s it.

      Protests go on for multi days and have a physical effect and achieve discomfort.

      Meanwhile, I don’t see the speech achieving a lot of that.

  • vvilld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Raised his national profile. If he keeps up political theater like this for the next 3 year’s he’ll have a good shot at the Democratic nomination.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Booker’s speech was an audition for Schumer’s job. He laid out his vision of the Democratic agenda, and showed strength doing it, contrasting with that craven, corrupt, simpering, weak, vile, weenie Schumer.

    Schumer is in the way, and needs to retire immediately, and make way for AOC to take his seat.

    If Schumer leaves, Booker become Minority leader, and AOC goes to the Senate, that speech will have acvomplished a lot.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Bookers 24h subathon showed strength nor vision. There was nothing differing him from Schumer except his age and skin color. According to DNC logic this makes Booker a worse candidate than Schumer.

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    It was a great show for what it was, but did it achieve anything? Not really. Which is, in and of itself, pretty sad.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    It got people to talk about it and take interest in what is going on. There are undoubtedly some portion of the population that are fully oblivious of the world around them, or just indifferent at least, but someone going on for that long has to make them wonder why he would do that.

  • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Absolutely nothing. It’s nice that he broke the record of some asshole racist but functionally nothing has changed.

    Democrats are just as impotent today as they were yesterday and throughout the Biden administration.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Senators (in the US) are elected representatives of their state. Sen. Booker, through his 25 hour speech, brought his constituents’ message to the forefront, criticized the Senate, Democrats’ and his own failures to act. He got millions of people to look at Senate business as if he was a professional streamer which is usually boring stuff. The speech is Booker’s answer to “what can I do at this moment to make a difference?”, which hopefully will get others to ask the same of themselves.

    It’s impossible to measure the true impact of the speech afterward, but it’s intended to inspire people to take action, resist the Trump monarchy, and cause “good trouble” where they can. Who knows whether this has had any influence on the Wisconsin Supreme Court which was a humiliation to Musk, or if it had any influence on the 4 Republican Senators joining Democrats to pass a resolution nullifying the false emergency against Canada?

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s political momentum. Same thing bernie and AOC are doing. None of them have changed anything yet, it’s just getting attention and support for future acts