Issue: there are 27 different ways of writing a date.
Engineers: We most make a common standard that is unambiguous, easy to understand and can replace all of these.
Issue: there are 28 different ways of writing a date.
Joke aside, I really think the iso standard for dates is the superior one!
2013-02-27 = 1984
@m_f@discuss.online this might be applicable to the farside as well
Do you mean the post titles? I’ve been using the same format as was used since before I took over posting, but if people want ISO format that works for me
I’m all for ISO format. I can’t imagine anyone having objections.
Posting in ISO format now, we’ll see if there’s any objections
I agree with the ISO approach, but unfortunately without mainstream adoption in a majority of countries it’s just another standard.
In the last company I work for, the department was created from zero, and my boss just let me take all the technical decisions so from the begging everything was wrote in ISO-8601. When I left it was just the way it was, if you try to use any other date format anywhere something is going to give you an error.
I was going to comain until I realized that the fprmat is the one that I prefer.
This is the way.
2013-02-27 is a weird way of writing 1361923200
My goodness, some of the comments in here must come from people who thought that those writing the standard were morons who did no research.
I don’t think they’re morons…just slaves to convention and compatibility. Not many ways to get away from that and justify it.
I am a big fan of iso 8601, I just wish it was possible to write more dates than February 27th, 2013 with it
Yeh but for that one day though, everything just works so well.
Harhar
This format can fuck off. I prefer the unambiguous format 2FEB2013.
Checkmate, date snobs.
And yes, nations are free to use their appropriate abbreviations for the months.
10:13 PM on February 27th, but how do you write the year?
10:13pm or 8:13pm? I can see how this is confusing… perhaps another cartoon with more guidance might be needed.
Personally I like date time groups: 272013 Feb 2013
So, assuming you got the time wrong and meant you could confuse year and time of day, ISO also puts time after date.
2025-05-01T18:18:03Z
Which makes sense. Higher unit to lower unit.
10:13 would be 2213 ?
I’m a fool
As long as the month comes before the day I can get behind it.
Ohh, dashes.
I feel like YYYYMMDD (without dashes) might be a format in ISO 8601, but I’m fully expecting to be corrected soon. But I didn’t say think, I said feel. YYYYMMDD has a similar vibe to YYYY-MM-DD, ya feel me?
It is. Photos and code merges use it.
Nope, you are correct! From the Wikipedia page, which cites the standards document:
- Representations can be done in one of two formats – a basic format with a minimal number of separators or an extended formatwith separators added to enhance human readability. The standard notes that “The basic format should be avoided in plain text.” The separator used between date values (year, month, week, and day) is the hyphen, while the colon is used as the separator between time values (hours, minutes, and seconds). For example, the 6th day of the 1st month of the year 2009 may be written as “2009-01-06” in the extended format or as “20090106” in the basic format without ambiguity.
