• Fighting back is always good, no matter the optics.

    Starting the fight is where it gets complicated. But we are long past that. They’ve already started the fight by throwing innocent people, including children, into dungeons. By beating non-violent protestors. By shooting them even with less-lethal munitions. By escalating the use of force when the situation was already dying down just to stoke the flames again.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Most people cannot sustain a 100% fight a 100% of the time for an indefinite number of years.

      That’s why it’s wisely to know when to ask people when to fight. Because if you ask everyone to fight all the time people will be burned out and maybe they don’t have energies to fight anymore when you most need it.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      The important bit is how you fight back. Anyone can stick a rag in a bottle of vodka and light it on fire, but that doesn’t really solve anything. It creates opportunities, but unless we have some kind of plan already in place for how to create a new democracy from the ashes of the old rotten one, some Neo-Napoleon will be happy to step in and create an autocracy in its place.

      The power is in organization and understanding, not the tip of a bayonet.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          You also don’t stick the rag in, you wrap it around the top and make sure your bottle is capped.

          The goal is to get the container to shatter on impact and then the burning material wrapped around it ignites.

          If you stuff a rag in that’s how you set yourself on fire by accident. Here’s a solid design, just for informational purposes only, of course:

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I get you, but IMHO Fantasy for example has a unique quality for escapism that should not be disregarded. I don’t want to say that fantasy is strongest when doing escapism, I just find it hard to regard one higher than the other. And while Sci Fi is no slob for escapism either, I do find it stronger when it reflects on humanity.

            • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              What do you think of the industrialisation aspects in Tolkien’s Legendarium?

              Yes, I think today, SciFi / Space Fantasy works best to directly reflect current situations and dangers. It can naturally be constructed in a dystopical way and used as an example for a bad future.

              For typical High Fantasy, imo it is way more difficult to pull something like that off, because it is usually closer related to our historical past. For topics like racism, discrimination or other social aspects (life during the plague?) it can still work nicely. But I agree, it’s a delicate matter to not “overdo” it and ruin the escapism.

              There are so many kinds of Fantasy, and all art imitates life in one way or another is what I’m saying :)