• 2 Posts
  • 149 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 22nd, 2024

help-circle











  • iii@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldA totally normal thing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Isn’t it possible with a VAT-like system, where a collecting agency returns the collected money to the central bank?

    Imagine being a business where you have to manually input, document and pay the daily changing VAT to the government.

    This actually doesn’t seem too bad. Most points of sale are digital.

    Imagine having to pay 1.00023 dollars

    Instead of changing it daily, only change it monthly/quarterly/… when the accumulated change is large enough to make a one dollar change on a 100dollar purchase? Isn’t the decision to change the interest fork currently only made after gathering macro-economic indicators anyways?

    I understand that insantly changing the transaction cost has an even faster reaction. But monthly might be good enough?


  • iii@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldA totally normal thing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Futures are still technically gambling. (…) There’s always a chance that the underlying asset radically changes in value between the contract and execution dates.

    Sure, I agree. But in the same technicallity; purchasing or selling anything is technically gambling, there’s a chance that it will devalue or increase in value over time. You could’ve bought (or sold) earlier (or later). (Electricity market, again, being an interesting exception, as the product is destroyed as soon as it’s created. One could say the true value is never discovered, as it’s only sold as futures).

    The MBS market basically directly lead to the '08 crisis, as you certainly know.

    The fundamental problem that lead to the '08 crisis was incorrectly priced mortgages, and risk of repayment/devaluation. Even if the morgages were held by the original issuers, the same outcome would’ve occured.

    It wasn’t the derivative market that was the problem.

    An example of a derivative, that I can’t think of any reason for existing, other than increasing risk, are leveraged ETPs. I’d call those as close to pure gambling of any derivatives I know of.








  • iii@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldA totally normal thing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    A derivative != gambling what the other 20% will do.

    A common derivative is a “future”.

    Pre-ordering a videogame is a future contract. It’s a way for game publishers to finance the development of the game.

    Sometimes futures are the only way to trade a product: all electricity is sold under a future contract. This refers to producers and consumers agreeing “tommorow 11am to 12am, I will consume (for the one party), and produce (for the producing party), 10MW of power”. It is a simple necessity to trade electricity as a future contract, as electricity isn’t easily stored, and the grid needs to be balanced (production ~= consumption) at all times. Here, the future contract is used as a method of coordination.