• athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Interesting director choice. Though, I kind of wish they would pretend Ep 7-9 never happened. Rey could have been a much better character and the sequels could have been better than a rehash of Ep 4-6.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            George Lucas can’t write dialogue to save his life. By the time of the prequels he was put up on a pedestal and nobody would stand up to him like they did during the original films.

            • Lyre@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ok I get that, but i might argue that at least the prequel writing has heart, and a purpose for the story. Do you genuinely believe the disney executive level writing in the sequels is better?

              • roofuskit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It’s less painful to watch. Meesa think you haven’t seen them back to back. As vapid as the sequels are I can turn my brain off and sit through them. The prequels bludgeon you in the face while watching them the entire time.

                • Lyre@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Meh, personally I’d still take the movie written by a human over the corperate ai, but i can see where you’re coming from. I dont exactly think theres a right answer when it comes to this particular debate

      • Lyre@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve been wondering about this for a while. Silly as the prequels were, they were still the result of one person’s vision and tried to tell a story. The new ones are neither, theyre corperate and disconnected from each other. So will they be met with the same nostalgia and re-examination that the prequels got? I really don’t know

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Another thing the sequels didn’t have: accompanying games. The gaps between movies weren’t filled exclusively by live action and animated series

          Sure, only Revenge of the Sith actually had an actual “the movie the game”, but the 90s and early 2000s saw a number of amazing Star Wars games (and some less than stellar), most only partially related to movies, others with completely news stories, which definitely helped keep people interested in the universe, even if they didn’t like the movies. KOTOR, Republic Commando, Battlefront, X-Wing series, Dark Forces series.

          Meanwhile, during the Disney years, we had Battlelootbox 1 and 2, Squadrons, Jedi Fallen Order+Survivor and… that’s about it (also some Lego Star Wars stuff). The mobile stuff might as well be SW skins of whatever is the current mobile trend.

        • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I totally agree with you, the magic of star wars is largely a product of Lucas’s mind. Sometimes newer installments capture flickers of that magic, but it’s pretty sporadic these days, definitely not enough to build a foundation of nostalgia. Plus, there’s little to no philosophical message in the sequels, so their value rests entirely on the action and dialogue, which was kind of lackluster compared to the execution of the previous movies.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            A large part of the magic of Star Wars, for me at least, didn’t really have much to do with Lucas. It was the EU books and comics, how they expanded the world and made the characters much more than simple archetypes.

            The biggest thing about them, though, is they built off what was already in existence. They didn’t try and replace or re-imagine it, they just let what was be and made it more.

            It didn’t always work (and quite often didn’t), but the beauty was that there wasn’t any really one thing you had to stick with to enjoy it. If you didn’t like one series or game or whatever? Don’t indulge in it.

            The problem with the new movies, and even for a lot of the shows, is that they present it as “This is your Star Wars now.” It’s not a whole wide world, it’s just a focused idea of what a few people want to make… and a few people want desperately to sell to an audience.

            • Lyre@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That was something that really baffled me about the disney acquisition. They spent 4 billion on the property but never thought to have someone explain to them what actually made it profitable. It was the universe that people latched onto, thats what sold the merchandise and the novels and spin offs. Yet the new films seemed almost spitefully bent on ignoring all that

        • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Prequel nostalgia exists because kids at the time liked them, and are now able to push back against existing criticism from older fans. There won’t be sequel nostalgia, because kids today simply don’t give a shit about Star Wars, so they’re not going grow up and decide to push back against sequel criticism.

            • Lyre@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Thats interesting, I was always under the impression that the animated series came out as a response to changing opinions about the prequels, not the other way around. But the more I think about it maybe the timeline doesn’t work out so you’re probably right

          • Lyre@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            True, i think superheroes probably fill that niche in cultural zeitgeist for kids growing up nowadays. So i wonder if we’ll see a similar phenomenon happen with something like Batman vs Superman or some other superhero property that was critically panned

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No. The last movie ruined the entire trilogy. And I liked TLJ, but there was no overarching story to the trilogy and the whole thing was completely pointless, but mainly the last movie was so so fucking awful.

        There is no fucking way anyone is going to appreciate them in 10 years. Sometimes movies just suck.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Does this imply that in Star Wars X, we will have a fight or convo with a contact in an arcade?

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Must’ve been expensive to get the director of I Am Somebody and Diane von Furstenberg: Woman in Charge.