• TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good. Fuck that fascist and his companies. The only sad part of this story is that they used paint and not something that would etch or scratch the stainless.

  • Gorilladrums21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I forgot how cancerous this site was. This place is such an echo chamber that the users are actually defending crimes

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      the real crime here is this death trap being allowed on the road in the first place.

        • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Where is the morality in a 56 bil pay package when you have done more damage to the reputation of said company while fucking over the workers of said company.

          • Gorilladrums21@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Protesting what exactly? Protesting for the sake of protesting is just meaningless. I still fail to see the morality here. What exactly is moral about vandalizing these cars?

            Also this notion that protests are only effective if they’re disruptive is a myth. If that was the case then the George Floyd Riots would’ve led somewhere or the pro Palestinian encampments would’ve led somewhere or all those climate protesters damaging historical monuments and art would’ve led somewhere or all those animal rights activists blocking streets would’ve led somewhere… but they haven’t. All they’ve done is lead people to resent them.

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Protesting what exactly?

              Protesting monster trucks becoming the default go-to vehicle to go run an errand or drive to work. You don’t need a “child-destroyer-3000: now Electric!” taking 3 lanes of width, weighing 20 tonnes, and occupying 4 parking spots, to go to your bakery or pick up the kids from school.

              What exactly is moral about vandalizing these cars?

              If certain vehicles end up costing more to manufacture/protect/repaint than the revenue upon sale, the company will stop manufacturing them. Same idea as deflating SUV wheels which are parked on the street: make lives for SUV drivers inconvenient so people won’t want an SUV.

              Also this notion that protests are only effective if they’re disruptive is a myth. If that was the case then the George Floyd Riots would’ve led somewhere or the pro Palestinian encampments would’ve led somewhere or all those climate protesters damaging historical monuments and art would’ve led somewhere or all those animal rights activists blocking streets would’ve led somewhere… but they haven’t. All they’ve done is lead people to resent them.

              “What did the resistance to Nazi occupation by the Polish people lead to? It didn’t work, genocide happened anyway, and all they did is making Nazis resent them”.

              I’m sure you’re aware that people engage in challenges they don’t know for certain they can achieve, right?

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is why the planet is fucked, you all whine that climate change is scary but then you cheer on people attacking electric cars just because Twitter man bad. You’re all desperate for tesla to fail because Elon upset you, someone doing something petty that’ll have zero effect on Elon but will negatively affect a regular person fills you with joy because it’s a way of hitting back at the bad man. Totally childish and pathetic.

    Spend that energy learning about and praising positive things, don’t win by tearing your opponent down win by building yourself up.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Its paint. They can still drive them. Stop being a little baby.

      Also, i don’t know about a single nice person that bought this low poly piece of shit.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ok… I’ll take the bait, can you please share links that show how the Cybertruck is actually good the planet? I didn’t actually read technical review about it. I mostly see silly (and sometimes fun) memes. I also recently read that EV in generals don’t have the same impact as electrical bikes, e.g https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2024/apr/11/evs-are-booming-but-electric-bikes-are-really-cutting-emissions , but maybe I’m misinformed and this vehicle by Tesla, despite its size, it’s actually helping. Can you please share a link to such review and/or studies with e.g Life cycle assessment (LCA) / ISO 14040?

      PS: to clarify I don’t mean articles about how it’s “changing mind”, I mean numerical estimations then comparison between one mean of transport, e.g non EV vs EV, or this EV vs other or this EV vs random electric bike.

    • RobotDaniel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      No matter what cars will be shit for the environment in some way, things like pubic transport, bike infrastructure and more walkable cities are things that actually help

    • MethodicalSpark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      All of the vehicles in the article were pre-delivery. As they were still owned by Tesla, it falls on the company to repair them.

      I’m not justifying vandalism, but the impact to the buyer is a delayed delivery vs a monetary and PR impact to Tesla.

    • arxdat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Their work sharing battery tech was monumental in starting the market and they’ve continued to really push things forward.

        I understand you have an emotional response to a distasteful man but ignoring reality makes you seem totally unserious and frankly absurd.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Right, I’m the one seeing things through a funnel of “emotional response” and ignoring the rest of the EV market because of nostalgia and a sense of devotion …

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They missed a trick by using paint, when a spray of salt water would have done the job at one more subtly and more permanently

    • smb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      while at the same time by-design cloaking it as pure bad quality could actually cause way more longterm damage than a little bit of paint.

      on the other hand the paint could also be just a marketing strategy depending on what they smoked to get new ideas

    • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Billions. They paid him the same amount of money (as a bonus!) as Bill Gates had in total when he was the worlds richest person in 2007.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Calling him a “cocksucker” is frankly insulting to people who perform the act of sucking cock. Musk is way too selfish to perform the generous and loving act that is fellatio.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      after paying him tens of millions, they did it again a thousand more times because thousands of tens of millions is billions. tens of thousands of millions of dollars. It’s an insane amount of money.

  • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Without justifying this really dumb act, because there’s no justifying it, […]
    How about we just don’t vandalize private property. That’s a good standpoint to build on.

    Wow, how unbased can an article get?

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is dumb. Sure Elon Musk is a dickhead. And sure Cybertruck is a dumb vehicle that only dickheads would want to have.

    But I’d rather the dickheads be driving a Cybertruck than some other massive vehicle that runs on fossil fuels.

    • kim_harding ✅@mastodon.scot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      @SpaceCowboy @return2ozma ~60% of Tesla’s profits come from the sale of carbon credits, which enable other massive vehicles that run on fossil fuels to be built. E-cars are not about “saving the planet” they are pure Greenwash which is saving the motor industry.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s more of a problem with how carbon credits are being regulated. Sure Tesla are being assholes for doing this, but it’s a corporation, I don’t expect them to be good guys.

        But none of that changes the fact that some meathead buying a Cybertruck instead of the equivalent fossil fuel monstrosity is reducing CO2 emissions in a direct way. Spray paint the sign a Tesla corporate HQ, don’t damage a vehicle which will only have the result of someone driving a fossil fuel vehicle a little longer while the damage is being fixed.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          If somehow murder became not illegal, it wouldn’t make all the corpses not murderer’s problem.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Literally the state of California would have lower CO2 emissions today if Tesla didn’t exist.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re assuming unscrupulous companies wouldn’t find another loophole or just pay a fine for going over the limit.

            Don’t get me wrong, Tesla is shit for helping with the loophole, but it’s a degrees of bad kind of thing. Getting fossil fuel vehicles off the road does reduce carbon emissions, but Tesla was exaggerating their numbers. They should be punished for doing this, but doubling up their numbers only works if the number isn’t zero.

            But this is all getting away from the fact that damaging these vehicles has the net effect of people driving fossil fuel vehicles longer. It’s a net harm to everyone.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      All car companies are run by evil dickheads. Most of them just make less noise than Elon.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They should have aimed at the non-stainless steel portion. Pretty sure you could wipe this up easy with some acetone or gasoline as a solvent.

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Yes Mr. Crowler we hear what you’re saying, but unfortunately spray paint voids your warranty.”

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t worry, for others they say turning it on voids warranty

  • LovesTha🥧@floss.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    @return2ozma Older Tesla’s one can give the owner the benefit of the doubt that they purchased it before Elon showed his true colours. No Cybertruck owner has that defence.

    They are lucky it’s just paint.

    I’m sure paint comes off ‘stainless’ steel real easy…

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “It makes no sense to vandalize Tesla’s property because you dislike Elon”

    Bahhahaahha. Bet.