• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    as a consumer why should I care if I still get a discount ?

    isn’t this influencer back office bullshit and not my problem ?

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The coupons honey applies may not always be the best deal around. Honey works with online shops to only serve you the coupons that specific online shop wants you to see, causing you to be ripped off on occasion.

      Simply put, there might be a 20% off coupon that can be applied to your cart, but because Honey is getting paid by the online shop, they are only going to show you at best the 5% off coupon. This makes Honey redundant, because neither Honey nor the online shop tell you when they are working together, which is why you can never trust honey to actually give you the best deal.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      it is your problem because they’re stealing your money too.

      famous person code gives you 30% off a product. honey tells you it’s 10% and keeps your 20% for its pockets.

      at least that’s how I understood it.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep and a great question that allows more people to learn. Please stop downvoting real questions

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          People are downvoting the tone, not the question. Calling it bullshit when it is seriously stealing money from other human beings and calling it “not my problem” under the assumption that it doesn’t matter if it affects others, displays absolute lack of empathy. Devaluing the question and making it a bad faith comment.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Technically isn’t telling anybody anything “stealing”? You’re transmitting a copy of the information and whoever created it gets nothing.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s kind of ridiculous how long it has taken for people to realise that this is happening… where did people think that their referrals had gone after they cratered?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      People realised years ago but didn’t really care much. End users generally don’t care since it doesn’t directly impact them, and “influencers” will often take a sponsorship deal without thoroughly researching the product or service being advertised, and probably just figured that people were buying less stuff due to the economy or whatever.

      The tech-savvy people that realised what’s happening tend to either avoid afilliate links, or use a cash back service (TopCashback, Rakuten, etc) that requires you to use their affiliate link.

      It’s not just Honey doing this. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why am I entirely not surprised that LMG knew what the fuck was going on, and didnt say a fuckin thing about it.

    Made more public comments over legitimate criticism about his “just trust me, bro” warranty, than about honey being a out and out scam.

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wait. How is honey a scam? It’s purpose is to give people discounts they didn’t know about otherwise, and as far as I can tell, that’s exactly what it’s doing. Maybe it’s in a gray moral area, but a scam?

      • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honey is getting paid by shops to only serve you the coupons that Shop wants you to see, potentially keeping you from discovering a better deal on your own.

        • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I have no idea how to find different discounts. If I’m getting a discount where I wouldn’t without the service, that isn’t a scam. Sure you can be more diligent and frugal if you know where to go, but I don’t, and I’m sure most people who use honey don’t either

          Edit: I would like to add, I mostly buy things on my phone, and as far as I know Honey isn’t on android, so I have never used it. I do, often, look for discounts on things I’m buying and almost never succeed. I really hope Honey comes to Android, so I can start saving money.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you actually watched the video you’re currently commenting on you’d have an answer to your question.

        But since you didn’t watch it I’ll give you a hint. It steals affiliate links taking money out of the pockets of those who are getting you a discount. It then uses those stolen affiliate links to take money out of your pocket as well by short changing you discounts (By telling you it found you a 10% coupon that is actually a 30% coupon and is pocketing the difference)

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Never watched the channel, but I would guess that being tech-themed makes it a worse look that they promoted it for so long before catching the issue, so they were worried it would cast doubt on all other endorsements and tank the value of advertising with them.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think coming out and pointing out what honey did would probably be the least damaging thing they’ve done in the past few years.

        because holy fuck have they had some whoppers.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The “hard R” thing still permanently etched into my brain lol.

          Context

          Linus misunderstood that the phrase “hard R” referred to the N-word. He thought it was the R-word. He was saying “people used to use hard R all the time, like on Family Guy and stuff. I used to use it too!” His co-host caught the misunderstanding and it was sorted out quickly before he said anything else embarrassing lol.

          • redisdead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            My favorite was the trust me bro shirt.

            You could see Luke having to physically restrain himself for calling his boss a fucking hard R word on live stream.

    • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They might not be able to say anything. Advertising contract might have a clause saying they can’t speak of the details of their deal, or speak negatively about the sponsor.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you dont know how a business makes money, chances are its some shady stuff

    Providing coupons on stuff for free, with zero ads? Thats pretty weird. Being Bought by PayPal for 4 BILLION dollars?!?!? There has to be some real sketchy shit.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      While I agree with you, I think we should be careful about allowing the ignorant to be punished. It’s unreasonable for a non-tech-savvy person to be aware of all the ways a company can screw you. If they’re skeptical of everything, they can’t use anything

  • Elrecoal19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Can someone ELI5? Does this mean they used refferal codes from people that had these “bring a friend” referal codes?

    • teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      some companies, instead of paying youtubers a lot of money to promote the product, tell them ‘we will give you some percentage of every sale we make that was advertised by you’ They do this by giving the youtuber an affiliate link. its basically the link to the product, except for that when you open it you get a cookie that says ‘[youtuber] brought me here’ What honey did, was replace those cookies with theirs, meaning they get the cut from the sale, instead of the youtuber.

      with for example, NordVPN, you get 35 dollars per sale with your affiliate link. if you watched a youtube video about NordVPN and then went into the description to buy it with the YouTubers affiliate link, honey would pop up and say ‘we have no coupons for you’ if you clicked on the close button of the popup honey would replace that cookie with theirs; if you would currently buy a NordVPN subscription, the money would go to honey, instead of to the youtuber that advertised it to you (who deserve the money)

    • cristo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Esperanto
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, it’s a little more complicated than that. How a video explained it was, say someone was trying to sell you a TV, you decide to buy that TV and the salesman gives you a card to let the cashier know who the salesman was to get the commission. When you’re at the checkout line, a different sales man comes up and offers to find you a coupon code to help save you money. In the process of looking, regardless of if a coupon code is found, the second salesman takes the original card the previous salesman gives you and switches it with his own unbeknownst to you or the original salesman. Then when you buy the product the second guy gets the commission.

  • SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    YSK the original creators of the Honey extension are the ones who designed it that way from the getgo. The important thing is they are also the creators of the new Pie AdBlock extension that is being prolifically advertised on YouTube. And the Pie extension does the same damn things as the Honey extension, despite being an ad blocker.

  • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I reckon if you’re stupid enough to click a thumbnail like that, you’re going to get scammed at some point anyway

      • datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Precisely the thumbnail that would prevent you from getting scammed.

        But… ya, that is the worst possible style of thumbnail regardless.

        • MetaStatistical@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          So, what thumbnail do you suggest? Can you post a thumbnail with your ideal design in mind?

          The point of a thumbnail is to attract viewers to your video, among the sea of millions of other videos that get posted every day. How do you propose they do that?

          • datavoid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I would generally suggest using thumbnails that don’t provoke clicking through annoyance. Anything involving heavily edited human faces, stupid expressions, text that could be inferred from the title, or the classic huge red arrows, is in my opinion either trying to appeal to children or get people annoyed enough to click to see what the video is about.

            Source - have spent way, way too much time on YouTube. PS do yourself a favour and install dearrow.

              • datavoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Mr Beast gets lots of views, yet it could be argued all of his content is garbage - getting views is not at all an indicator of quality.

                • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  This is true, but it doesn’t change the facts that the channels with good content, which is highly subjective, also want to maximise the viewership.

                  Think of it like this, there is a subset of people that will click the video based on whether the title seems interesting and don’t care about the thumbnail; these people are always going to click. Then there is a subset who need these kind of thumbnails to drive clicks to their channel.

                  You can go and find countless YouTubers discussing this topic and how it really does affect the metrics of the channel. Do I like these thumbnails? Not really. Do they annoy me in anyway ? Not really. I care about the content and everything else is just superficial noise.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                YouTube even allows A/B testing for thumbnails now so creators can know with far more certainty what style of thumbnail generates more clicks. I’ve even observed the A/B testing occuring as I’ve scrolled past a new video mentally marking it to watch later then later seen the same video with a different thumbnail

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m waiting for the installment to tell me about what personal Data they’re scrapping, and then judge whether or not it negatively affects me. So far the first video in the series details how Honey is screwing creators out of affiliate commissions, which is interesting, but not something I give all that much of a shit about. The coupon stuff is more interesting, but it’s not like I’m wading through the popup nightmare of coupon sites to scour the absolute best coupon for any given thing on any given day. Sometime if it’s a high dig item i’ll look around. The Honey plugin shows me the price history of any given item (on sites it works on) over a 6 month period of time, which informs me as to whether or not there are large downward dips on something I might end up waiting for a sale, which by looking at history, could be reoccuring regularly. Lot’s of work went into this vid series, and I’m looking foward to the next one, but so far, nothing to get me to unistall Honey.

    • moonlight@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The video shows how Honey doesn’t actually get you the best deals, with ‘approved’ discounts. I don’t care about affiliate links either, but I certainly don’t want to be making Paypal so much money for no reason.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I, too, love to support companies that I know fuck people over after they sign contracts. If I find out they’re harvesting my data, I’ll just love them even more. That’s The Art Of The Deal, baby!!

  • TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I heard about this extension years ago. I wasn’t always suspicious about it, but I still never used it. I can’t say I’m surprised that it turned out to be a scam.

    I’d rather pay full price honestly than support stuff like this.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Rent-seeking middlemen. This is the pinnacle of capitalism. Taking revenue while providing nothing is maximum efficiency. You can tell because it raises prices invisibly for everyone.

    This is just a baby version of how credit card companies have placed a 1%-5% sales tax on the global economy. You might say “at least the CC companies provide a service”, but that tax get’s added no matter if your using a CC or not.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cause they can’t charge more for CC purchases so they raise the prices for everyone.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Credit card fees get baked into the general price and are averaged between all the accepted cards. Hence cash transactions and lower-fee cards (debit, credit with less benefits) end up paying more of the share of the higher-fee cards.

        It’s well explained in the following video: https://youtu.be/OceYCEexDqQ

      • Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In Italy it’s illegal to raise the price if you are using a credit card. The price needs to be the same no matter the payment method

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you get a credit card machine you sign an agreement saying something like transactions under X amount we, the credit card network company, will charge you 50c or any transactions over X amount we will charge your 1.5%.

        Now as a business owner you raise prices 1.5% to cover this fee. If someone pays in cash, the extra 1.5% goes to you, if the customer pays with a card, the 1.5% goes to the card network .

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The same price must be charged for products purchased with credit card or cash. Otherwise the card provider will withdraw their service from the retailer. So the credit card margin is added to every price.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          card provider will withdraw

          Dubious, as I regularly see gas stations with separate cash vs card prices. I’ve seen small businesses offer discounts for cash, too. And it’s not like visa is going to stop processing cards because walmart started offering cash prices. It’s just scare tactics. And for big companies, people who pay in cash offer bigger profit margins, so it’s not like they are incentivized to help the situation.

          • keckbug@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Actually true, but outdated. There was a massive decade long $30b legal fight that eliminated credit card network’s “anti-steering” provisions. Those were contractual terms that retailers signed that prohibited them from offering different prices for cash and card. Some retailers have responded by offering different prices, or otherwise adding a processing fee to card transactions as a result of that settlement.

              • keckbug@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Obviously it varies from business to business. Some may not want the hassle, some may see consumer sentiment against fees and not feel it’s worth the impact. Some are content to merely leave prices 3% (or more) higher.

                Ultimately, very few businesses price things based on their costs…instead they price based on what they think people are willing to pay, or what the market will bear.

                It’s also worth considering, at the scales of many of these businesses, accepting and handling cash is very much not a free option. If I’m a supermarket chain, I pay a card company a few percent and maintain my payment terminals and I magically get my income deposited daily directly in my preferred bank account. I’ve got some risk with stolen cards and chargebacks, but the big Chip Card and Mobile Wallet rollouts have dramatically limited my exposure to that liability.
                With cash I have a substantial cost to handle, collect, count, and deposit at each location. I have concerns about counting accuracy, interval and external theft, counterfeit currency, purchasing change from my local bank (which typically has a fee assessed for businesses), etc.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because enough people use credit cards that businesses have felt compelled to raise prices across the board to compensate.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ccc is just an Amazon price tracker. IIRC their revenue is generated by clicks (the outbound hyperlinks have their Amazon affiliate identifier).

      WRT to the affiliate program itself, no idea. Last I checked it still does what it says on the tin.