• Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Murdering women by not allowing them to get abortions when every doctor involved says she will die without care.

    Abortion? Fetus dies.

    No abortion? Fetus and woman dies.

    I see no reason to go with #2 without assuming they just flat out hate women.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brave of you to assume fetuses can crawl… in nearly all stages of development there are no developed locomotion muscles.

      • Funkytom467@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not a good argument, nor true.

        A foetus is the stage after the embryo, when organogenesis is done meaning tissue and organs have formed, right up to the point of delivery.

        This means at delivery, a foetus becomes a baby by coming out, no other changes.

        So i wouldn’t really call that difference relevant in a moral debate. The stages of development or number of weeks is, but you can’t really distinguish the two without this specification.

        That’s why where i live we allow 14 weeks after the first absence of periods for example.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an interesting point, and would make a dope video art exhibit. I’m not sure cuteness is quite philosophically sound as a way to measure personhood, though.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You went to sleep in the driver’s seat of a vehicle at a festival, hit the parking brake with your unconscious hand, and rolled over a tent with somebody in it.

  • Olivia@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There will never be a dumbest reason to kill somebody. Humankind will always be inventing the next dumbest reason.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m trying to think of the dumbest one I’ve heard of, and there’s so many options I can’t quite pick one. So, this.

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if we are in a simulation and the only way to truly live is to die in the simulation?

  • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A few years back it snowed in Seattle, which is uncommon. I saw a video where folks were having a snowball fight, as you do. A snowball entered the partially open window of a driver. The lady proceeded to Hop the curb, and drive up some embankments trying to hit people with her car.

    For a fuckin snowball.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guy I know was in his car when it was hit by kids having a snowball fight. So he drove straight at them onto the pavement, trapped them in a shop doorway and cracked their heads together before heading in his way. There was an article in the local paper about the police looking for him because one of the kids suffered a broken jaw. He still feels that it was a justifiable course of action .

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That guy is a fuckin menace, and a liar to boot. If he really thought he was justified he’d have turned himself in to the police, but he knew what he did was wrong even if he will never admit it to anyone including himself.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The dude is an asshole, but this is bad legal advice. Never talk to the cops directly. Always go through your lawyer.

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I - a not-lawyer - am dispensing legal advice on this internet forum post. Fine work identifying it as such, detective; I’ll see you back at the law factory.

  • Lemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well if you kill everyone, will there be anyone left to shame you? Therefore, it wouldn’t be dumb to kill.

      • TXL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And when you kill a man, you’re a murderer. Kill many and you’re a conqueror. Kill them all and you’re a god.

        Edit: oh. That’s my answer to op: religion.

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We get in a fight at a tripple crossroads. He dies. Then I go back to his kingdom and marry his wife. Little did I know she was my mother and he was my father…

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Revenge. How should killing a person make it better?

    And war, some rich people profit, normal people die