• mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I get the sentiment, that we’re not killing nature, just ourselves, but “nature” is not one thing. Killing nature amounts to humans causing incredible suffering to untold trillions of individual animals each with a lilfe, a consciousness.

    I saw my Kitty suffocate due to embolism and had to put her down and it’s no less of an awful event because it was a cat and not a human, it screwed me up and it was years ago. I imagine that level of needless suffering happening every day X 1 billion due to human greed and apathy.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Nature” also has lots of suffering in it even without our help. I agree we shouldn’t cause undue harm, but the suggestion that animals won’t suffer without us is naïve at best.

      My condolences for your kitty, but nature would not have granted her the more peaceful end you gave her.

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty sure I already specified unnecessary suffering, I didn’t suggest that animals wouldn’t suffer without us.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        i like the ever so slight implication here that a handful of deer could presumably cause global warming if we just didn’t exist now.

        I wonder how likely that is to be true.

        • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Human-accelerated global warming wouldn’t happen via a handful of deer… But global warming was going to happen even if humans never existed. Global temperatures have waxed and waned since before life existed. The only difference here is that we’re pressing on the gas pedal (literally) and accelerating the process. The idea that global temperatures would have never climbed without humans empowers denialists by giving them a strawman to point at.

  • Tug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Earth will shrug us off and carry on. It would be interesting to see what’s next. I suspect a marine mammal, jellyfish, or crab people.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Fun fact : this was the (slightly hidden) premise for Splatoon.

      Those happy, colourful descendants of squids and other marine animals are playing paintball over the ruins of our civilization, long after human extinction.

      They worship an old fax machine they found, too, for some reason.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They worship an old fax machine they found, too, for some reason.

        That tracks. Fax technology probably will outlive us all.

        • brsrklf@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah. It was revealed mostly through a couple of “scrolls”, rewards in the single player mode.

          There was a human fossil (somehow petrified while playing Wii U) dated 12,000 years ago, and documents from scientists warning about global warming and oceans rising.

          Last scroll was a message from a scientist, “the professor”, in the middle of the big extinction event 10,000 years before Splatoon. At that point all land life would disappear very soon. The professor did the logical thing and saved his cat.

  • Johanno@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Climate protection was never about saving species or eco systems.

    It is about not fucking the whole planet wide eco system so that we can’t live anymore on this planet.

    However even that we dropped for profits.

    I mean basically anything relating to energy would have costed the double amount (at least).

    Now we have also to reduce the co2 that was produced 200 years and the one that is triple the amount of the next 10 years.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is so fucking stupid.

    No seriously. Stop. Think. This is SO FUCKING STUPID.

    Humans can live IN SPACE. We are NOT destroying ourselves. We are HYPER ADVANCED COCKROACHES. We will easily survive whatever damage we cause to the planet.

    The problem with destroying the planet is not that we’re destroying humanity. What a stupid, egocentric take. The problem with destroying the planet IS THAT WE’RE DESTROYING THE PLANET.

    “Mass extinction? Eh who cares” is a FUCKING STUPID TAKE and I have no clue why so many people here are okay with it. What the fuck is wrong with all of you? This is NOT OKAY. MASS EXTINCTIONS ARE NOT OKAY.

    Is this a fucking psyop? What the fuck?

    • Ropianos@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, survive yes. But self-sufficiency is a big problem. The world is nowadays so interconnected that even a problem in only one region can severely affect all of humanity (e.g. semiconductors from Taiwan). So yes, a collapse of our modern society is certainly possible.

      Destroying the planet is not really a thing. Mass extinctions in the past were a big deal but at the same time: Earth recovered. We only have a big problem because the plants/animals we need might go extinct.

      Obviously valuing nature and wildlife diversity in and of itself is good but it doesn’t have any intrinsic value in regards to supporting society.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Destroying the planet is not really a thing

        Also, can everyone please shut the fuck up with the “Well ACKSHUALLY, you’re not destroying the literal ball of rock and magma so you’re not destroying the planet”. Fuck you, you know what it means.

        • Ropianos@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sorry, I meant “destroy the planet” as in lifeless/only single celled organisms.

          And you can kind of see humanity as “just another big asteroid impact”. Nature will recover competeley over the next million years or so. That’s what I meant with mass extinctions being kind of inconsequential for the planet as a whole on geological time scales.

          Obviously mass extinctions are also bad besides their effect on human society, I just meant that that is mostly a spiritual one thats hard to measure, about lost potential and eradicating a species. As a thought experiment, is eradicating a disease, a form of life, inherently negative? Mosquitoes? Do you agree that it’s a big achievement that we eradicated small pox? What if we eradicate all existing diseases?

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Mass extinctions are BAD. Not because of how it affects human society, Jesus Christ. They’re just bad because we shouldn’t be fucking up the planet. That should be a baseline moral understanding and it’s terrifying that none of you are seeing it.

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you might have misread the message of this comic. It’s not saying mass extinction is ok, or that we shouldn’t try to preserve the environment. It’s saying nature doesn’t need us, and we are killing ourselves. Nature and life will go on long after climate change kill us all. It’s saying humans are so egocentric they use the words “destroying the planet” when they only destroy themselves.

      Also as far as I know we can’t live in space for very long currently.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just to touch on a problem but there.

      Humans can live IN SPACE.

      Ahhh no… We can habitat space. We really really can’t live there.

      We can’t really give birth or develop in space, gravity unlike ours will eventually deteriorate our bodies, even on Mars you will go blind and start developing clots before too long just from the slightly lower gravity. And that’s nothing of the radiation we are blocked from here on Earth.

      The list is long and bad. We are adaptable but mostly on Earth adaptable. Able to survive climates and regions not everything ever. We can probably eventually figure out space but we can never just live there.

      So when we destroy the planet we might really just take ourselves out too.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        And more important than the below discussion, anyone got any more fucking “ACKSUALLY” comments from the goddamn peanut gallery?

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s a conversation. Are you really this upset just cause reality is less magical than science fiction?

          It’s not a peanut gallery. It’s the rest of the users on this site. The whole point of being here.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lemmy is the most socially maladapted userbase I’ve ever seen on an internet forum. Almost every single time you make a statement, some hair-splitting contrarian will show up with a single counter example to derail the discussion.

            I’m upset because you people need to learn how to communicate, and I’ll keep cussing at you until you get it.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              The idea of living in space was on topic that you brought up.

              You were wrong about it.

              If you are upset then get off the Internet don’t take it out on other people assuming you are the only one who is right.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Of course we can. We could build a giant rotating shielded space station. We have all the technology, we just haven’t done it because it’s expensive.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I studied theoretical astrophysics as part of an earth and space exploration field.

          Trust me, we really don’t just have all the technology. That doesn’t answer a lot of problems and you are assuming our level of science.

          We might be able to figure out a good chunk of it if money is of no cost but that’s no guarantee.

          Man not even to talk about material cost. It would take us decades.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah I am not inspired to actually bother answering that if you are coming into this without an expectation of an actual conversation.

              It sounds more like you want a fight and that’s not what I’m doing.

              Space is not an easy answer. Even if you just want it to be.

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah and you are doing the same. I pulled my credentials you just don’t want to be wrong cause it hurts your feelings.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    We’re actually going through the 6th mass extinction right now, so actually we are kinda killing most everything on the pla et, not just us.

    We should want to preserve that. Unfortunately a handful of old rich dudes don’t care.

    • yetiftw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      you missed the point completely. life has always survived mass extinction events and will survive this one too. life will eventually flourish once again and humanity will have been a blip in earths history

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Right, the Gaia presented in this comic is a mother nature who does not give a shit about the lives of billions of animals. She only cares if life as a whole survives, she doesn’t care how many species go extinct and become lost forever. Only humans care about that.

        Humans are the universe’s way of giving a shit about itself.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        This specific bird is way to forgiving. It’s more like saying if on average 1 species dies every million years on average, we have killed thousands of species in a thousand years. Then throw in the idea that we also could say the percentage of population of those species we killed would be over half of them, we can say to ourselves, yeah this is really being accelerated. Mass extinction has already begun. People who say humans will survive it are optimistic because our adaptability. It’s more like if you want your descendants to be able to go outside and be able to breathe without life support systems, you should so something about it.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Going through? Yes. Causing? Yes. Could have modified or prevented it? Also yes in countless and effective ways over literally centuries.

      Will we? No. No, we will not.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    story of my life, i hope.

    I think it’ll be funny to have a well known legacy, but without people having any idea of who the fuck i am.

    God speed humanity, you fucking suck.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the only correct perspective, and there are relatively few people specifically at fault for the lying that’s been done to the public on important issues.