• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why would they have to? The second the assassin revealed themselves to collect, they would be the most hunted person on the planet.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m assuming a scenario where the perpetrators are killed on the scene, and the actual masterminds are already in Iran or in Iranian proxy territory, and for some time after the attack, their identities unknown to the west.

                It’s certainly not beyond Iran and its proxies to keep someone hidden in total luxury for the rest of their life.

                In a scenario where the perpetrators or planners have somehow made it to Iran and are known to the West, no, for sure, sovereignty will not stop the West from getting them.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  And yet no one’s tried to collect the bounty yet as far as we know. And clearly not because of the skill and diligence of the United States Secret Service.

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            The sanctions on Iran don’t prevent them from transfering money to most of the world, and 80 million dollars is pocket change for almost every single country.

            They could have the money on a Cayman Islands or Swiss account by the end of the day, the problem is living long enough to spend it.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Is there a point to sanctions if they can transfer money to buying agents for whatever they need? Maybe the sanctions are all weapons & tech related or something.

              Hmm, guess they used to be able to do U-turn payments just by using banks in various counties. If that’s harder now then it’s prob more expensive to get whatever they need since they have to pay someone enough to make it worthwhile for them to break the law. 🤷‍♂️

              • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Look for example at the EU Sanctions, they impact around 270 individuals and organisations, but allow Iran to conduct legitimate business. The problem is that 80 million is relatively easy to pay in the middle of some of the legitimate business.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they did, I bet it would be one of those enormous cheques, like on Publishers Clearinghouse

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Two attempts after being a walking bag of human refuse for 84 years isn’t very surprising. It’s actually surprising that there haven’t been more.

  • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The real crazy part is that it’d be perfectly legal for Joe Biden to issue the same offer, so long as it’s through professional channels as an official act. The SCOTUS said so. Hell, to make it crystal clear, just order it through the military and then watch from the situation room. He could take out a few SCOTUS justices at the same time. And then unilaterally dictate that that sort of shit is not legal going forward. Best October surprise ever.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Pizzagate was kind of a joke though, all the damage from the email leaks involving the DNC was already done by then.

        The only thing it accomplished was maybe slightly increasing Republican votes. Everyone on the left side had already decided how they would vote.

        It’s similar to Harris in that she chose to ignore the uncommitted movement a while ago, which means most of the left has already decided how they’re gonna vote. Any last minute details are unlikely to change much unless it’s seriously huge.

        • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hillary said she was accused of pizzagate, look it up in google, and they trainwrecked he whole campaign even if it was made up. So it came in October for her and she is warning Harris that be wary because something could pop up and derail your who campaign no matter how ubserd it sounds.

          • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, I thought there was some new story. Yeah, I was aware of that 8 years ago. And the “Hillary’s emails” “scandal”. And the trump “grab them by the pussy” tape. It’s all so cyclical. Nothing surprises me anymore. There will be firehosing to distract from trump’s actual existential disqualifications. He’s an easily manipulated, lying, stupid asshole. Meanwhile Harris is compassionate and educated, and has been duly elected to all three branches of government. She and Walz aren’t perfect, but it’s laughable to suggest that the alternative in this election is even worth considering. Anybody who believes something in the realm of pizzagate in this election cycle is feverishly searching for an excuse to vote for trump without being honest about their hated for women, minorities, and/or anybody left of the extreme right.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is there a smaller payout if we just deport him and dump him off at The Hauge?

    We could feed two birds with one scone. Take the money and build some affordable housing.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    When Trump said he would debate Biden anywhere, any time, I said Biden should agree to a debate in Tehran.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    How would you even collect? Better yet, can you collect both this bounty and the $150,000 “posted” by his would-be assassin?

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably by certifying intent beforehand and having them provide exit support so you can go to Iran and spend the rest of your life there out of reach of US retaliation, assuming a minimal willingness to hunt you down in a foreign nation.

      Things would probably get complicated if the regime collapsed though, non zero chance those 80 million dollars would become useless as a new state tries to establish its own monetary policy, and that’s assuming they aren’t western friendly and decide to extradite you to curry favor.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      You could make a PDF of the assassination plot, hash it, and get the hash timestamped. Then after the assassination, publish the PDF.