• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    GBC almost exclusively these days, I just can’t devote the time to things like Morrowind anymore as much as I want to. I do want to hack my OG Xbox and run Voodoo Vince, Psychonauts, and Gauntlet: Dark Legacy again, but then that only brings me up to like 2003.

  • Emma Liv@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I like old and new. I love my retro emulators (which I put a lot of effort into setting up just right; and I’d love some original hardware if I could afford it). I also love my PS5.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Without piracy and the industry wanting to move digital only we are doomed.

    Keyword: “without”.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I care more about the backups of my ROM collection than I do about my tax returns or resume or other “important” crap.

    If I can’t just decide to replay Mario 2 or Simon’s Quest or Chrono Trigger or Symphony of the Night when I’m in my 70s, then what is all this fancy technology we’ve invented really good for?

  • JoeKis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean you OWNED the games after purchase back then, now the publishers and game studios can revoke your “purchased” license anytime…

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Gameplay is always king.

      Graphics can contribute a lot - some games are fucking gorgeous, and I’ll stop and appreciate good scenery in digital environment the same as IRL.

      But jaw-droppingly incredible graphics can never compensate for bad or even mediocre gameplay.

      And shit graphics will never kill a game with good gameplay. Done right, shit graphics can even be charming in a nostalgic kind of way.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Come on, Call of Duty is not that old! /s

    The problem is people keep buying new versions of the same games released around 2000.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Game consoles are solid-state and tend to not wear out like cars.

      That said, my car is from 2003.

  • theangryseal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve been playing Zombies Ate My Neighbors on original hardware today haha. On my old Apple color monitor.

    I mostly game on old systems or my steam deck.

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Emulated games are free, polished, complete

    Modern games are $80+ steaming incomplete pile of shit

    This mystery will never be solved.

    • Emma Liv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Almost all of my modern games are indies. Most cost between $5 and $30. I love retro too but if we’re going to only include modern “AAA” titles in the comparison…

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Modern games: requires $300+ game console or a $300+ GPU to get 30 FPS

      Retro games: runs on your grandma’s Dell Pavilion still running Windows XP that she refuses to stop using, gets 50/60 depending on region

    • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I assume they’re referring to actual hardware. I’d imagine the percentage of gamers playing emulated games is much higher than 14%.

      Edit: Found the article

      It appears I am correct.