• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    The more I think about the Fermi paradox, the less interesting it gets. The great filter isn’t necessary. It’s just the distances.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The distances don’t account for the complete, total lack of evidence, though. Our civilization is detectable to dozens of light years at least, if you’re looking. And we are looking. So, the others… Where are they?

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Right, a few dozen light-years is like… Less than a rounding error lol. The Milky Way galaxy alone is like 100,000 light years across, and around 1000 light years thick. If we treat the Milky Way as a cylinder, that’s a volume of roughly 8 trillion cubic light years to sift through.

          Granted, a cylinder is a massively naive simplification for calculating the volume of the galaxy and probably way overestimates things. But even dropping that estimate down several orders of magnitude, billions, or even millions of cubic light years is still an unimaginably large region to search for life. And that’s just one galaxy. There’s billions of galaxies (that we know of), and some are even bigger than the Milky Way. Searching through all of that for life, especially when we don’t really know exactly what to look for, is a hilariously huge task.

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            I doubt any civilisation has made intergalactic travel. There are enough worlds in any galaxy that there is very little purpose in venturing to another galaxy. The distance between galaxies is also insane. Even with faster than light warp speeds it would take thousand of years to reach a different galaxy.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          There are habitable planets orbiting about one in five stars. So a few hundred habitable worlds in that range. Why do none of them transmit?

          • deafboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            If I’m not mistaken, the habitable means posibility of liquid water. I’m not aware of any of those planets to be truly able to host a life as we know it. It’s always either high radiation, toxic atmosphere, tidal lock, or dozens of other things…

            And how would they even transmit? We can barely talk to Voyager that’s basically on our own front lawn. A planet out-shouting it’s own star seems a bit sci-fi.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I once made feta, blueberry and rosemary stuffed chicken thighs… My captive guests would have felt very comforted by this comic that night.

    Some things shouldn’t be overcome.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    A theory I’ve been writing into a fiction for a while is that Earth is just the oldest planet with life on it and Humans are the most technologically advanced species in the universe. The reason nobody has contacted us is because the rest of the universe is still basically in the caveman stage. Of course, my story is set like 1000 years in the future, after we have FTL spacecraft and start finding alien life on other worlds to know this. Also: Things don’t turn out well for the aliens.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Let’s just hope the humans you are writing have moved past capitalism

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      There is actually some real theories, i think kurzgesagt covered or at least mentioned it that makes a mathematical case for us to still be in the very early stage where advanced complex life can possibly form.

      Maybe not the first, but one of em.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Also, if you compare the age of the universe right now to how long it will be until heat death, we are absurdly early. We’re in the first 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of the universe’s lifespan.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Thing is, the universe is really really really fucking big and old. There might have been a million other super advanced societies throughout the universe space and throughout the universe life, but the chances of us knowing about them would still be negligible.

      There are tens of billions of planets just in the milky way, most of them probably at least 5 billion years old. And there are hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe, if not trillions. The nearest one is 25,000 light years away. Do the math.

      The chances of life existing elsewhere are pretty much 100%. The chances of us ever knowing about it are pretty much 0%.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Sounds like a good story. A lot of SF has a forerunner civilization concept, but I can only think of a couple that present anything about their early stages.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          One of my DMs ran a campaign in his world, specifically to have a story because he had been world building for 6 years at that point. Might be something to consider, obviously you’d probably need a system other than D&D, but there are loads of Sci Fi systems out there that could probably be adapted to your world.

          That’s also how the first Dragonlance novels were written.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yeah that’s kinda the point. That Intelligent life will eventually invent a way to eliminate itself is probably an extremely human concept though.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’d rather say our filter was/is the carboniferous. We have too much energy for our technology level.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        We have a lot of available energy everywhere when you think about it … it’s not the energy, whether abundantly available or not, around us that is the problem … it’s in how we use and abuse it all.

        The problem is not the things we use, or create, or have access to, the problem is us.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    What if the Great Filter is explained by civilizations gradually declining in reproduction due to societal and climate factors, leading them to stagnant or collapse before they can reach interstellar exploration?
    There are already countries experiencing population decline which suggests this could be a real, observable trend.

    Let’s be honest though, the ruling class would never allow it. They would ensure reproduction by force, if necessary.

    It’s certainly a thought experiment, though.

    • De_Narm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      That is a very human centric way to approach it. For starters, we don’t even know if other life has to be carbon based, let alone in which environments it exists. There could be an entirely different ruleset to their reproduction and of course their society. And even ignoring all these things, they could simply advance a lot faster, outpacing climate change and declining populations. Heck, we could be outpacing these problems if we never stopped puring endless ressources into space travel, but alas, capitalism deemed it unworthy.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yes, as a human, i usually have human-centric thoughts.

        You are right, of course.

        Sorry for sharing my thoughts.

        • De_Narm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Don’t apologize, I didn’t mean to invalidate your thoughts. Until we’ve found other life, everything is possible. Maybe they all are slightly different humanoids with similar problems. In fact, many theories about why haven’t found anything yet are based on the very same assumption.

          I just meant to add some additional food for thought.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            It’s fine, I’ll just go cry.

            No, no worries. lol
            I recognize that realistically that’s not reasonable on a universal scale, even if humanity were to follow that path. It’s just an interesting thought experiment.