• jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even better, the “violent video game” they’re blaming is Among Us!

      screenshot of NBC article
      (Not my screenshot, and I haven’t actually read the article)

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Of all the games they try to demonize, they demonize a game type people have played at home for decades at parties, in person, with no computers.

        Brilliant.

        90s house party game here, I’m sure people played it earlier.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Interesting, had no idea about its origin story.

            Also… of course

            In June 2006 a Rockingham school inquiry was launched after parents complained of the traumatic effects classroom Mafia was having on their fifth-grade children. Davidoff responded to the reports, saying that as a parent who had studied child psychology for 25 years, he felt that the game could “teach kids to distinguish right from wrong”, and that the positive message of being honest could overcome the negative effects of an “evil narrator” moderating the game as if it were a scary story.

            • jqubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you enjoy the game you should check out The Traitors with its many international variants. I was surprised to read that the productions provide psychologists to help the contestants as it gets traumatic, but when I watched the first UK season there were a lot of people getting into emotional distress.

              There have been a lot of people cast who really shouldn’t be on the show; it’s just a game!

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This has been done over and over again to entice boomer parents to get their kids to stop playing video games. My parents didn’t let me buy any shooter games other than jet force gemini becuase they thought it was a exploration game…

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s rock music. It’s “reefer madness”. Then it’s metal music with satanic messaging when played backwards. Now it’s video games. Same old blame game while never tackling the actual problems of lack of psych care, real societal pressures like financial difficulties, and more.

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I mean aside from LSD being introduced by the CIA into the public, everything else the government tries to blame someone else.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Boomers’ children are grown ass adults with their own kids now. Those parents are the ones who grew up playing games. This dumbass narrative doesn’t play anymore

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m talking about boomer parents. In respects to the millennial parents, of course they are laughing at this shit (or I would hope so)

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Boomers are the parents of Gen X kids.
            What you’re saying doesn’t make any sense.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        My parents didn’t let me buy any shooter games other than jet force gemini

        At least you landed on solid gold! Jet Force Gemini was the single best shooter for the N64. Far superior to Golden Eye. Yes, I’ll die on this hill.

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is how you radicalize actual children. It’s clear these people are completely oblivious to the fact that every 10 year old in the country knows among us and plays it. Actual children will see how completely absurd all of this is. I love this move. Go ahead, show the children how utterly out of touch the top is.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    Violent crime has decreased since the 1990s as video games (including violent ones) have continued to grow in popularity. If anything, this establishes that violent video games prevent violent crime.

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Correlation is not causation. I agree that vidya doesn’t cause crime, but the correlation is not proof of that.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sure, but they’ve only ever had correlational evidence to suggest video games cause violence. Their own correlational evidence does not support their conclusions, and that should be called out and ridiculed.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right, so then the original article would also be untrue (or at least not provable just by observing both numbers).

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, that’s the problem. It’s our bread and circuses, not an entire industry designed to take our money and kill us.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      If someone wanted to make a fast buck right now, I bet a game where you go hunt down CEO’s and virtually… you know, accomplish your mission goals on them, it would be wildly popular.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Trying to fill a 24-hour news cycle requires a lot of bullshit, and Fox, NBC, CNN, CBS, and your favorite news outlet are happy to shovel it.

    Stop watching partisan, billionaire-owned news outlets and start consuming international news and non-partisan sites. (Like the AP and Al Jazeera)

    Also, watch moderate people on the other side of the political divide. It may annoy you in some ways (like how I can’t listen to Maher when he gets on the topic of Israel), but you’ll learn more and you’ll have more nuanced views, which will benefit you in ways you can’t fully understand until you’re able to think about things in a different way. I’m a leftist, so for me, it’s been Bill Maher, Chris Williamson, or Jon Stewart. More people need to learn what they don’t know that they don’t know.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      I started working in local TV news 17 years ago. I figured out pretty quickly there’s enough actual news happening to fill the 24-hour cable channels, but sending out reporters and photographers (maybe even producers) is expensive. It’s much cheaper to just have somebody in the studio blabbering on about a few things and trying to stoke reactions from the audience. It can even build a bigger audience than actual news.

      Sports radio and TV is an even bigger (though less damaging) example of this. They have a lot of time to fill when games aren’t on, and a lot of times they just put someone on who will give the dumbest take possible just to get the audience mad and have an argument with someone else in the studio or even let the audience call in to argue.