What a dumb asshole.
I pressed the demo button on a keyboard in a music store once.
My second album will be out next month if anyone is interested.
I to have no talent and am unable to create traditional art.
But what about getting likes without any effort or personal involvement??! /s
I’m tired.
-More Creative
-Creates the same thing over and over
-Cannot create new things like an overfull wine glass without reference imagesif traditional art is transphobic how are drag queens a thing
(i know drag !== trans but still)
AI could make this less pixelated…but so could whatever humans and/or bots took the screenshot and shared it everywhere.
To be fair, sourcing vegan-friendly art supplies is often significantly more frustrating than finding vegan food. But as others have said, doing - do I call it ‘traditional digital’ art? - is going to have a much smaller environmental impact than AI generation systems that are dependent on servers. A used Thinkpad x230 > Midjourney?
Also wanna add that in theory I’m not against AI art generation, only the way it’s usually implemented. All creativity is derivative, and as long as the user is remixing free and public domain content, I think the gained accessibility for far more people to bring their expressions to life where they otherwise would not have been able to, is worth far more than the perceived threats felt by a stagnant copy monopolist industry.
But the key thing here is proper implementation. It’s like every time we get a new toy, we forget all over again that software freedom is a moral imperative in all forms of software.
Freedom relies on consent and mutual reciprocity, otherwise it’s exploitation. AI art diffusion models that scraped digital art portfolios and did not gain the consent of the artists nor did the artists get compensation is exploitation full stop. There is no freedom in exploitation.
None of the hypothetical methods I described would do that.
None of the hypothetical methods I described would do that.
So it’s exploitive then.
No, it’s not. Why are you like this?
The present models are, is the point i think the other person is making.
I haven’t looked into it too much, because I don’t bother to use these things myself. But if I remember, there are some systems that are open-source, can be run locally, and then a person could train those systems on only public domain and freely licensed works. That is the kind I’m talking about, so bringing up the systems I’m not talking about is just a strawman.
What art are they looking out? Artists have been making powerful pieces with hidden messages and symbols since forever. Even graffiti can be used to disrupt and inform. Yes, there is garbage, but there’s garbage everywhere.
theres no thumb just another index finger …
Digglet thumbs
OP: Nothing’s better than AI art!
Me: counts fingers suspiciously
That’s a pretty long pencil
also sharpened by some wacky sharpener that leaves an off-center tip
And wobbly.
Something is making me suspect this is AI generated, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.
I mean, the shorter an object is, the harder it is to snap.
Please make me a wine glass filled to the brim with wine, almost spilling over.
🎣
How much you bet on that this very same person is now part of the “dark enlightement” after the progressives almost unanimusly rejected generative AI slop?
