If anyone can find more pixels for me i would appreciate it.

Thanks y’all.

  • Olap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yous in Scotland is great to wind up Proper English speakers. If they whinge they get a y’all

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is guys really needed after youse?

    The guys is needed where there’s no 2.pl pronoun to distinguish from individual you, but youse fixes that

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I can’t speak for anyone else, but you seem to be missing the biggest issue with this map: saying “you guys” excludes anyone but those identifying as male. You may not mean it that way, but I’ve had women be offended when I used that in the past, and I wouldn’t like being referred to as a “gal” in a group of women. It’s just not accurate.

    Personally, for a gender-neutral way of addressing a group, I like “you folks”.

          • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            And which minority group do you belong to that makes you an expert on their issues?

            Alternate reply: oh no my feewings you win

              • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                So like, just because you ‘studied’ linguistics you think that makes you an expert on how language should always be used or that people should not feel a certain way about language just because you say so?

                That’s not exactly a compelling argument.

                Language is always going to carry certain meanings for some folks and we do a disservice to people by ignoring that, we all have our own personal lexicons/semantic meanings to a degree and that will likely never change, we do best by understanding this and working together to understand and accept when certain language can be hurtful and thus find ways of talking that do work for each other.

                I feel that’s a better way of being than talking down to someone like you just did and telling them that how they feel about it doesn’t matter and they should just get with the program, which is never going to work.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Kamala lost. The idpol of kinder language is a trashfire and a failure because the assumption that “empathy” is a shared quality among humanity is wrong and “bloodlust” is actually far more common, while complete ignorance and anti-intellectualism and accusations of “overthinking” prevail over both as you can see in the programming.dev techbro below.

          Talking about how language influences views of marginalized or minority groups is useless when most people can barely even read more than a paragraph without bitching because they never developed reading stamina.

          As for those who make these conversations necessary in the first place - they will always use the meanest word they can and all this has done is fed fuel to reactionaries.

          There are far more important real fights to fight, like access to HRT and surgeries for people suffering from gender dysphoria - a crippling disorder, before you metropolitan libs start going on about “trans-femmes” and “masculine gendered language”

  • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would have thought that “y’all” is even more so gender neutral and therefore less offensive/more accepted. It’s a contraction of “you all” right?

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Honestly it’s just so useful. It should be the default.

          I picked it up when I lived in Houston, but when I was bartending and stuff after returning to my home state, I’d use it heavily.

          Interestingly, though, it made people think I was from another country entirely? Because in absolutely no other way do I sound even remotely southern. (I do use various non-American slang, but not with strangers) Was always a blast to have someone ask where I was from, and try to get them to pinpoint why they didn’t think I was local, when I was born 15 minutes from where the conversation was taking place :p

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Y’all = you all, which is gender neutral.

    Also that map is missing the Chicagoland y’all exclave.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This statement has strong Bilbo " I like less than half of you as well as you deserve" energy

      (No hate, it just struck me as funny)

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I lowkey always found that to be a southern type of insult, I could hear Steve Spurrier saying it

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah you just replace you with youse. Example:

      Happy birthday to youse, happy birthday to youse. Happy birthday this fucking guuuuy! Happy birthday to youse!

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    “y’all” fills a legitimately useful gap the English language has. Other languages have a word like this.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The worst is when a language formally has a disambiguating word but then speakers all just decide to not use it.

    • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any examples of an equivalent in other languages?

      I speak a small amount of French but can’t think of one

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        “Vous” is the first one that comes to mind in french. But since it is also a more formal (and/or “respectful”) version of “tu/toi”, it can both designate a group of people or a single person, depending on the context (just like “you” in English). Sometimes people will use “vous tous” (literally “you all”) to make this clear.

        It is a little better than the “you” situation in English since if you are speaking with someone that is not using the singular form of “vous” to speak about you (which is basically anyone you are familiar with unless they are your boss or In-laws and kind of oldschool), it is instantly clear what they mean at least.